1:"$Sreact.fragment" 2:I[79520,["/_next/static/chunks/c14ecd726bc2083a.js","/_next/static/chunks/505e4ebfa08d2f59.js","/_next/static/chunks/e4c290a724a96cb5.js"],""] 3:I[32482,["/_next/static/chunks/c14ecd726bc2083a.js","/_next/static/chunks/505e4ebfa08d2f59.js","/_next/static/chunks/e4c290a724a96cb5.js"],"default"] 4:I[25045,["/_next/static/chunks/c14ecd726bc2083a.js","/_next/static/chunks/505e4ebfa08d2f59.js","/_next/static/chunks/e4c290a724a96cb5.js"],"default"] 5:I[39756,["/_next/static/chunks/ff1a16fafef87110.js","/_next/static/chunks/247eb132b7f7b574.js"],"default"] 6:I[37457,["/_next/static/chunks/ff1a16fafef87110.js","/_next/static/chunks/247eb132b7f7b574.js"],"default"] 8:I[97367,["/_next/static/chunks/ff1a16fafef87110.js","/_next/static/chunks/247eb132b7f7b574.js"],"OutletBoundary"] 9:"$Sreact.suspense" b:I[97367,["/_next/static/chunks/ff1a16fafef87110.js","/_next/static/chunks/247eb132b7f7b574.js"],"ViewportBoundary"] d:I[97367,["/_next/static/chunks/ff1a16fafef87110.js","/_next/static/chunks/247eb132b7f7b574.js"],"MetadataBoundary"] f:I[68027,[],"default"] :HL["/_next/static/chunks/2539a84631621ab4.css","style"] 0:{"P":null,"b":"dBupw7NhcwHQYJ3xpO0N4","c":["","topics","westminster-vs-1689-federalism-covenants-baptism-and-the-table"],"q":"","i":false,"f":[[["",{"children":["topics",{"children":[["slug","westminster-vs-1689-federalism-covenants-baptism-and-the-table","d"],{"children":["__PAGE__",{}]}]}]},"$undefined","$undefined",true],[["$","$1","c",{"children":[[["$","link","0",{"rel":"stylesheet","href":"/_next/static/chunks/2539a84631621ab4.css","precedence":"next","crossOrigin":"$undefined","nonce":"$undefined"}],["$","script","script-0",{"src":"/_next/static/chunks/c14ecd726bc2083a.js","async":true,"nonce":"$undefined"}],["$","script","script-1",{"src":"/_next/static/chunks/505e4ebfa08d2f59.js","async":true,"nonce":"$undefined"}],["$","script","script-2",{"src":"/_next/static/chunks/e4c290a724a96cb5.js","async":true,"nonce":"$undefined"}]],["$","html",null,{"lang":"en","children":[["$","head",null,{"children":["$","$L2",null,{"defer":true,"src":"https://umami.malin.onl/script.js","data-website-id":"cd36ea60-04d2-41c7-a1dc-c1f3c9d5bd77"}]}],["$","body",null,{"className":"antialiased","children":["$","$L3",null,{"children":["$","$L4",null,{"children":["$","$L5",null,{"parallelRouterKey":"children","error":"$undefined","errorStyles":"$undefined","errorScripts":"$undefined","template":["$","$L6",null,{}],"templateStyles":"$undefined","templateScripts":"$undefined","notFound":[[["$","title",null,{"children":"404: This page could not be found."}],["$","div",null,{"style":{"fontFamily":"system-ui,\"Segoe UI\",Roboto,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif,\"Apple Color Emoji\",\"Segoe UI Emoji\"","height":"100vh","textAlign":"center","display":"flex","flexDirection":"column","alignItems":"center","justifyContent":"center"},"children":["$","div",null,{"children":[["$","style",null,{"dangerouslySetInnerHTML":{"__html":"body{color:#000;background:#fff;margin:0}.next-error-h1{border-right:1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.3)}@media (prefers-color-scheme:dark){body{color:#fff;background:#000}.next-error-h1{border-right:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,.3)}}"}}],["$","h1",null,{"className":"next-error-h1","style":{"display":"inline-block","margin":"0 20px 0 0","padding":"0 23px 0 0","fontSize":24,"fontWeight":500,"verticalAlign":"top","lineHeight":"49px"},"children":404}],["$","div",null,{"style":{"display":"inline-block"},"children":["$","h2",null,{"style":{"fontSize":14,"fontWeight":400,"lineHeight":"49px","margin":0},"children":"This page could not be found."}]}]]}]}]],[]],"forbidden":"$undefined","unauthorized":"$undefined"}]}]}]}]]}]]}],{"children":[["$","$1","c",{"children":[null,["$","$L5",null,{"parallelRouterKey":"children","error":"$undefined","errorStyles":"$undefined","errorScripts":"$undefined","template":["$","$L6",null,{}],"templateStyles":"$undefined","templateScripts":"$undefined","notFound":"$undefined","forbidden":"$undefined","unauthorized":"$undefined"}]]}],{"children":[["$","$1","c",{"children":[null,["$","$L5",null,{"parallelRouterKey":"children","error":"$undefined","errorStyles":"$undefined","errorScripts":"$undefined","template":["$","$L6",null,{}],"templateStyles":"$undefined","templateScripts":"$undefined","notFound":"$undefined","forbidden":"$undefined","unauthorized":"$undefined"}]]}],{"children":[["$","$1","c",{"children":["$L7",[["$","script","script-0",{"src":"/_next/static/chunks/582fcad204626214.js","async":true,"nonce":"$undefined"}],["$","script","script-1",{"src":"/_next/static/chunks/dc3071b92ac8713b.js","async":true,"nonce":"$undefined"}]],["$","$L8",null,{"children":["$","$9",null,{"name":"Next.MetadataOutlet","children":"$@a"}]}]]}],{},null,false,false]},null,false,false]},null,false,false]},null,false,false],["$","$1","h",{"children":[null,["$","$Lb",null,{"children":"$@c"}],["$","div",null,{"hidden":true,"children":["$","$Ld",null,{"children":["$","$9",null,{"name":"Next.Metadata","children":"$@e"}]}]}],null]}],false]],"m":"$undefined","G":["$f",[]],"S":true} c:[["$","meta","0",{"charSet":"utf-8"}],["$","meta","1",{"name":"viewport","content":"width=device-width, initial-scale=1"}]] 10:I[27201,["/_next/static/chunks/ff1a16fafef87110.js","/_next/static/chunks/247eb132b7f7b574.js"],"IconMark"] e:[["$","title","0",{"children":"Westminster vs. 1689 Federalism: Covenants, Baptism, and the Table | Theology Topic"}],["$","meta","1",{"name":"description","content":"If you’re weighing classic Reformed covenant theology (Westminster) against Baptist federalism (1689), here are three questions that clarify the differences. Here we unpack each one and include the full King James text of the key passages so you can test the logic yourself—then we add a practical guide to the sacraments: **Baptism** and **the Lord’s Supper**."}],["$","link","2",{"rel":"canonical","href":"https://theologyinsights.test/topics/westminster-vs-1689-federalism-covenants-baptism-and-the-table"}],["$","meta","3",{"property":"og:title","content":"Westminster vs. 1689 Federalism: Covenants, Baptism, and the Table | Theology Topic"}],["$","meta","4",{"property":"og:description","content":"If you’re weighing classic Reformed covenant theology (Westminster) against Baptist federalism (1689), here are three questions that clarify the differences. Here we unpack each one and include the full King James text of the key passages so you can test the logic yourself—then we add a practical guide to the sacraments: **Baptism** and **the Lord’s Supper**."}],["$","meta","5",{"property":"og:url","content":"https://theologyinsights.test/topics/westminster-vs-1689-federalism-covenants-baptism-and-the-table"}],["$","meta","6",{"property":"og:image","content":"https://theologyinsights.test/static/topics/19/Westminster%20vs%201689%20Federalism%20Guide.c6a060b9464d.png"}],["$","meta","7",{"property":"og:image:alt","content":"Westminster vs. 1689 Federalism: Covenants, Baptism, and the Table infographic: Westminster Vs 1689 Federalism Guide"}],["$","meta","8",{"property":"og:type","content":"article"}],["$","meta","9",{"name":"twitter:card","content":"summary_large_image"}],["$","meta","10",{"name":"twitter:title","content":"Westminster vs. 1689 Federalism: Covenants, Baptism, and the Table | Theology Topic"}],["$","meta","11",{"name":"twitter:description","content":"If you’re weighing classic Reformed covenant theology (Westminster) against Baptist federalism (1689), here are three questions that clarify the differences. Here we unpack each one and include the full King James text of the key passages so you can test the logic yourself—then we add a practical guide to the sacraments: **Baptism** and **the Lord’s Supper**."}],["$","meta","12",{"name":"twitter:image","content":"https://theologyinsights.test/static/topics/19/Westminster%20vs%201689%20Federalism%20Guide.c6a060b9464d.png"}],["$","link","13",{"rel":"icon","href":"/favicon.ico"}],["$","$L10","14",{}]] a:null 11:I[29599,["/_next/static/chunks/c14ecd726bc2083a.js","/_next/static/chunks/505e4ebfa08d2f59.js","/_next/static/chunks/e4c290a724a96cb5.js","/_next/static/chunks/582fcad204626214.js","/_next/static/chunks/dc3071b92ac8713b.js"],"default"] 12:T5dbc,

Westminster vs. 1689 Federalism: Covenants, Baptism, and the Table

Audio Overview Video Overview

If you’re weighing classic Reformed covenant theology (Westminster) against Baptist federalism (1689), here are three questions that clarify the differences. Here we unpack each one and include the full King James text of the key passages so you can test the logic yourself—then we add a practical guide to the sacraments: Baptism and the Lord’s Supper.


1) Is the New Covenant new in form and clarity while one in substance with Abraham—or does it redefine membership so only the regenerate can be “in”?

Classic Reformed covenant theology (Westminster) says there is one Covenant of Grace across redemptive history, administered differently before and after Christ, but always the same in substance (Christ and His saving benefits). That’s why Paul can argue that the way Abraham was justified is the way we are justified—by faith—and why Gentile believers are counted as Abraham’s children.

Galatians 3 (key lines)

Galatians 3:7–9, 14, 16, 29 (KJV) 7 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. 8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. 9 So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. 14 That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. 16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 29 And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Romans 4 (key lines)

Romans 4:1–5 (KJV) 1 What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? 2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God. 3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. 4 Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. 5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

Romans 4:9–12 (KJV) 9 Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness. 10 How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision. 11 And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also: 12 And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised.

Takeaway: Paul grounds Christian salvation in Abraham’s pattern. The substance hasn’t changed (grace through faith); the administration has (from shadow to fullness in Christ). That’s Westminster’s heartbeat.

Baptist federalism, by contrast, argues that Jeremiah 31/Hebrews 8 makes the New Covenant “regenerate-only,” so only those who personally “know the Lord” belong to it and thus receive its sign.

Jeremiah 31 / Hebrews 8 (key lines)

Jeremiah 31:33–34 (KJV) 33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.

Hebrews 8:10–12 (KJV) 10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people: 11 And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest. 12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.

Westminster reading: These promises are certainly and effectually true for the elect (the “invisible church”). But until glory, the visible church remains a mixed body (wheat and tares, a net with good and bad). So the New Covenant is new in efficacy and clarity, not a total redefinition of visible membership.


2) Do Acts 2:39 and 1 Corinthians 7:14 still place believers’ children within the visible church’s orbit?

Classic Reformed covenant theology says yes: God’s ordinary way is to gather households, and the visible church therefore includes believers and their children. That’s why Westminster includes the children of believers in the visible church and gives them the covenant sign.

Acts 2:39 (KJV) For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.

1 Corinthians 7:14 (KJV) For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy.

Takeaway: Peter reaffirms the you / your children / the nations pattern of Genesis 17, now widened to “all that are afar off.” Paul calls believers’ children holy (set apart). Westminster sees this as warrant for keeping the family shape of the visible church in the New Covenant—with baptism as the covenant sign given to believers and their children.


3) Does Colossians 2:11–12 support sign continuity (circumcision → baptism), or does it sever the subjects of the sign from the Abrahamic pattern?

Westminster argues that baptism succeeds circumcision as the covenant sign of union with Christ and cleansing—so the subjects (believers and their children) remain the same in the visible community, even as the sign changes from blood to water.

Colossians 2:11–12 (KJV) 11 In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ: 12 Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.

Takeaway: Paul links what circumcision signified (heart-renewal) with what baptism signifies (union with Christ’s death and resurrection). The meaning is fulfilled in Christ; the sign changes; the covenantal logic of God claiming believers and their households continues.


Putting it together

Answer these three questions from the classic Reformed compass and you land with Westminster:

  1. Continuity of substance: Salvation has always been by grace through faith in the promised Christ (Gal. 3; Rom. 4). The New Covenant is “new” in clarity and power, not a different way of salvation.
  2. Covenant family: The promise pattern remains you / your children / the nations (Acts 2:39), and believers’ children are still called holy (1 Cor. 7:14), so they belong within the visible church’s orbit.
  3. Sign continuity: Baptism succeeds circumcision as the covenant sign (Col. 2:11–12). The sign changes, the subjects (as to the visible community) do not.

That is why Westminster teaches one Covenant of Grace under various administrations, believers and their children as members of the visible church, and baptism as the fitting covenant sign for both.


The Sacraments in This Frame: What They Are, What They Do, and How to Practice Them

A. What is a sacrament?

In Scripture, a sacrament is a God-instituted sign and seal of His covenant grace—exhibiting Christ and confirming His promises to believers.

Romans 4:11 (KJV) And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe…

Salvation itself is by grace through faith, not by bare participation in rites:

Ephesians 2:8–9 (KJV) For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.

Hypothetical: Lydia sits under the Word and receives baptism and the Supper for years, yet never truly trusts Christ. The signs won’t save her by themselves. But when Noah believes the gospel, those same signs become means of grace—the Spirit uses them to strengthen the faith that saves.


B. Baptism: Meaning, Subjects, Mode, and Practice

1) What baptism signifies (union, cleansing, new life)

Romans 6:3–4 (KJV) Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.

Titus 3:5 (KJV) Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;

1 Peter 3:21 (KJV) The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:

Colossians 2:11–12 (KJV) (already quoted above)

In short: Baptism visibly preaches the gospel: Christ’s death and resurrection applied to us, cleansing and new life received by faith.

2) Who should be baptized (subjects)

Hypotheticals:

3) How baptism is administered (mode and authority)

Practical execution (Westminster-shaped):

Hypotheticals:


C. The Lord’s Supper: Presence, Purpose, and Practice

1) What the Supper is (Christ’s real spiritual communion with believers)

Does the Supper save? Not by itself. Christ saves, and we receive Him by faith; the Supper nourishes that faith.

John 6:35 (KJV) And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.

(Reformed teaching takes John 6 as chiefly about believing; the Supper is the visible Word that strengthens this believing.)

2) How to come to the Table (faith and self-examination)

1 Corinthians 11:23–29 (KJV) For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord’s death till he come. Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body.

Hypotheticals:

3) Frequency and setting

Practical execution (Westminster-shaped):

Hypotheticals:


D. Bottom line on the sacraments

The most biblically correct way to understand and execute them, in this classic Reformed frame, is:

  1. Treat them as God’s signs and seals—not magic, not mere memorials.
  2. Administer Baptism to believers and their children, once, with water in the Triune Name, as admission to the visible church.
  3. Administer the Supper often to repenting, believing Christians, with clear preaching, self-examination, reconciliation, and pastoral care.
  4. In both, insist that faith in Christ is essential for saving benefit; warn against unworthy use, and comfort the weak and penitent.
7:["$","$L11",null,{"topic":{"slug":"westminster-vs-1689-federalism-covenants-baptism-and-the-table","title":"Westminster vs. 1689 Federalism: Covenants, Baptism, and the Table","description":"If you’re weighing classic Reformed covenant theology (Westminster) against Baptist federalism (1689), here are three questions that clarify the differences. Here we unpack each one and include the full King James text of the key passages so you can test the logic yourself—then we add a practical guide to the sacraments: **Baptism** and **the Lord’s Supper**.","sourceDirectory":"src/19","inlineEmbeds":[{"href":"https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/0a06676d-fd9c-4fcc-ab92-4143bbbd7c95?artifactId=e3d2259b-072c-4921-9063-2a564a7f5d55","label":"Audio Overview","kind":"audio-overview"},{"href":"https://youtu.be/JbYyJDunhJ0","label":"Video Overview","kind":"video-overview"}],"sections":[{"slug":"westminster-vs-1689-federalism-covenants-baptism-and-the-table","title":"Westminster vs. 1689 Federalism: Covenants, Baptism, and the Table","description":"If you’re weighing classic Reformed covenant theology (Westminster) against Baptist federalism (1689), here are three questions that clarify the differences. Here we unpack each one and include the full King James text of the key passages so you can test the logic yourself—then we add a practical guide to the sacraments: **Baptism** and **the Lord’s Supper**.","contentHtml":"$12","inlineEmbeds":["$7:props:topic:inlineEmbeds:0","$7:props:topic:inlineEmbeds:1"],"markdownPath":"src/19/Westminster vs 1689 Federalism Covenants Baptism and the Table.md","audio":[{"label":"Reformed_Covenant_Theology_and_Sacraments.m4a","relativePath":"19/Reformed_Covenant_Theology_and_Sacraments.m4a","absolutePath":"/home/temp/src/19/Reformed_Covenant_Theology_and_Sacraments.m4a","publicPath":"/static/topics/19/Reformed_Covenant_Theology_and_Sacraments.d898f02fd09a.m4a","missing":false}],"images":[{"label":"Westminster vs 1689 Federalism Guide.png","relativePath":"19/Westminster vs 1689 Federalism Guide.png","absolutePath":"/home/temp/src/19/Westminster vs 1689 Federalism Guide.png","publicPath":"/static/topics/19/Westminster vs 1689 Federalism Guide.c6a060b9464d.png","missing":false}],"youtube":["https://youtu.be/JbYyJDunhJ0"]}],"meta":{"seriesOrAuthor":null,"date":null},"primary":{"playlist":null,"shortVersion":null,"videoOverview":"https://youtu.be/JbYyJDunhJ0"}},"navigation":{"previous":{"slug":"hell-separation-from-god-perseverance-and-assurance-in-christ","title":"Hell, Separation from God, Perseverance, and Assurance in Christ"},"next":null}}]